fix(vip): let 积分兑换说明 support HTML like the reference theme
The points-exchange desc was stripped at all three layers: no sanitize_type on the schema fields (save ran sanitize_textarea_field), the runtime re-ran the same strip, and the points modal escaped it with esc_html. The reference theme declares sanitize=false and concatenates the value raw into the modal. - Schema (SPA + PHP): sanitize_type html, rows 2, help text noting HTML support - PaymentRuntime: output via wp_kses_post - VipServiceModal points modal: render via wp_kses_post instead of esc_html Verification: new contract test covers schema/runtime/modal layers; node --test tests/**/*.test.cjs 641/641 pass; php -l clean on both PHP files.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
2e2558e5ce
commit
dcb80cff6e
5 files changed
+18
-4
No files matched your search
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ class SchemaPayment {
|
||||
['key' => 'points-exchange', 'title' => '积分兑换会员', 'fields' => [
|
||||
['key' => 'pay_vip_points_exchange_s', 'label' => '启用积分兑换', 'type' => 'switch', 'default' => false],
|
||||
['key' => 'payment_vip_points_packages', 'label' => '兑换套餐', 'type' => 'textarea', 'default' => "1|500|30|积分月卡\n1|5000|0|积分永久", 'dependsOn' => ['key' => 'pay_vip_points_exchange_s', 'value' => true], 'help' => '每行:等级|积分|天数|标题(天数 0=永久;普通用户可开通,已有会员可续费同等级或升级更高等级)'],
|
||||
['key' => 'pay_vip_points_exchange_desc', 'label' => '兑换说明', 'type' => 'textarea', 'default' => '', 'dependsOn' => ['key' => 'pay_vip_points_exchange_s', 'value' => true]],
|
||||
['key' => 'pay_vip_points_exchange_desc', 'label' => '兑换说明', 'type' => 'textarea', 'sanitize_type' => 'html', 'default' => '', 'rows' => 2, 'dependsOn' => ['key' => 'pay_vip_points_exchange_s', 'value' => true]],
|
||||
]],
|
||||
['key' => 'modal-copy', 'title' => '界面文案', 'fields' => [
|
||||
['key' => 'pay_user_vip_desc', 'label' => '会员介绍', 'type' => 'input', 'default' => '开通VIP会员,享受会员专属折扣以及多项特权', 'dependsOn' => ['any' => [['key' => 'pay_user_vip_1_s', 'value' => true], ['key' => 'pay_user_vip_2_s', 'value' => true]]]],
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user